Sofie Kallevik, Account Executive at Marinova Analytics, a provider of fuel-efficiency and emissions-compliance software for shipping fleets, had spent four months working an opportunity at Vestland Bulk Carriers AS, a Bergen-based operator of twelve dry bulk vessels. Her primary contact was Anders Bru, Fleet Performance Manager, who had reached out directly after the IMO's tightened carbon intensity requirements made his existing spreadsheet-based fuel reporting untenable.
Anders was everything a seller hopes for. Engaged, responsive, technically fluent. He ran two data-mapping workshops with Sofie, pulled consumption logs from six vessels for a pilot analysis, and told her more than once that this was "exactly what the fleet needed." He said he would take the business case to the wider team before the next budget cycle closed.
Three weeks later, the process went quiet. When Sofie finally reached him, Anders was apologetic but vague. "It's more complicated than I thought," he said. "There are some concerns I wasn't expecting." The concerns, it turned out, were not about the product's fuel-efficiency modelling, which nobody had questioned. They came from two people Sofie had never spoken to. A Head of IT Security had flagged that the platform's API would need read access to vessel operational systems, a data-governance question nobody had raised in four months. And a Technical Superintendent, responsible for actual shipboard operations, had asked why a tool with this much influence over reporting had been evaluated without his function in the room at all.
Anders had believed, in good faith, that reaching agreement with him was the same as reaching agreement with Vestland. He was not the decision-maker. He was the mobilizer, the person most convinced the change was needed and most willing to advocate for it internally. The actual sign-off sat with an Operations Director who had not attended a single workshop, and the ability to stall the whole process sat with two people who had never been part of the conversation at all.
Sofie's instinct was to send Anders more material to help him make the case. The better question was who else needed to be in the room, and why it had taken a stalled process to find out who they were.
Apply the buying group framework to a live opportunity. Map the real stakeholder landscape, not just the people you have already met.
We will send you a confirmation email. Once confirmed, your PDF is ready to generate.
Please enter a valid email address and accept the terms.
Check your inbox
Confirmation email sent
We sent a confirmation link to . Click the link in the email to unlock your PDF.
Link is valid for 24 hours. Check your spam folder if you don't see it.
Email confirmed
Your PDF is ready
Your email address has been confirmed. Click below to generate your report.